Brent Coker Internet consumer psychologist Dr Brent Coker

Home >

Keeping negative Facebook comments leads to more trust in your brand

9. March 2013

 

Many companies spend a lot of time controlling what’s said on their Facebook pages. Deleting negative comments is one way to ensure customers don’t form negative impressions about the brand. On the face of it, this makes sense. Public comments that are all positive should instil trust towards the brand, building associations with high quality. Positive comments mixed with negative suggest flaws in the brand’s ability to provide a consistent high quality product or service. Or does it?

I have long argued that natural communications about your brand should not be tampered with. It is rare that a brand does not have some unhappy customers on occasion. These customers should be given the chance to publically display their disgruntlement. In other words, brands should never tamper with their Facebook page by deleting negative comments, only allowing the positive comments to shine through. Ideally, responding to negative comments creates an opportunity to show the world that you care. The result is greater feelings of trust, honesty, and genuiness towards your brand.

Consumers form relationships with brands, much like we form relationships with other people. In the same way we form impressions of other people, we also form impressions of brands. Who wants a friend that is not genuine in the way they communicate with us? We want honesty, because honesty suggests that person cares about us. Our closest friends will tell us what they think, and will also help us when we need it. Only telling people what you think they want to hear is not a good way to build lasting strong relationships.

To demonstrate how this works, we conducted an experiment at the University of Melbourne. We exposed three separate groups to three separate Facebook Pages. Group one saw a Facebook Page where the comments were 100% positive. Group two saw a Facebook page where the comments were a mixture of positive and negative. Group three saw a Facebook page where the negative comments where responded to by the brand.

 

Figure 1: All Positive Comments

Figure 2: Mixed Comments with Reponse

 

Results

 

The results were as follows. As we would expect, participants in the Positive group viewed the Positive comments as being more positive. This response mirrors what many brands expect.

 

 

However, simply viewing a brand as positive does not necessarily speak to more valuable traits such as honestly, trustworthiness, and genuineness. These traits lead to long lasting strong relationships. As we predicted, those who viewed the Facebook page with a response from the brand viewed that brand as more genuine.

 

 

When we look at the differences between honesty and trustworthiness, we see a stronger effect.

 

 

 

 

 

These results suggest widespread practice of deleting negative Facebook comments about your brand may be throwing the baby out with the bathwater. The results suggest that publically responding to negative comments can have a dramatic impact on perceptions of honesty, trustworthiness, and genuiness towards the brand. Interestingly, even simply keeping the negative comments does not result in any significant decrease in honesty, trustworthiness, and genuiness. 

Google+

Comments (5) -

10/10/2011 12:03:34 PM #
I'm very pleased to see academic results in support of an important business issue.  It'll be great to have these stats on hand when defending social media practices in the future.  

I absolutely agree that you need to respond to customer complaints and even leave them there for all to see. I suggest a couple other related strategies in a recent blog post (found here: www.whereoware.com/.../...iew-into-a-positive.aspx), which I'll share here:

- a rapid response is best
- respond to specific issues, tailored to each complaint
- no canned responses!
- don't delete unfavorable responses without a reason.  

Basic courtesy will go a long way towards keeping your customers content, even if they've run into problems previously.  Too often we've seen companies 'fix' issues in ways that are only beneficial to them, which is the opposite of what consumers want to see.  It's important to keep in mind: How do you think your response makes the customer feel?  How would you feel if you were the customer?  

Just as with many business decisions (and yes, it's clear by now that Facebook has become a natural extension of a brand's business strategy), it's crucial to treat your customers as individuals with the same interests and demands that you have when YOU'RE in the customer seat.  Demonstrate that you're interested in resolving their problem, even if you don't know how to do so at the moment.  Customers will appreciate it, and your stats here show that such a reaction will be beneficial in the long run.


Cheers,
Jenna Dutcher
Whereoware LLC
www.whereoware.com
10/11/2011 5:08:32 AM #
Interesting stuff. Do you have any more info on the methodology of the study, especially on how big the sample sizes were?

Thanks,

Dave
10/11/2011 11:31:33 PM #
Hi Dave,
The sample size was close to 300, spread across the three groups. A little large in my opinion, but power was acceptable given the p -values.
The analysis was between subjects design. I thought about giving F values above, but then decided against for various reasons. However, all differences noted above are (statistically) significant.
Brent
10/12/2011 5:52:23 AM #
Thanks, that's great - I'm so used to studies ignoring statistical rigour that it surprises me when things are done properly!
10/17/2011 8:38:13 AM #
I think it's dangerous to apply this way of thinking to every situation, but I enjoyed reading about the study and it has some interesting results. I've experienced some situations with brands where there are a few people who are literally just interested in ranting/complaining (in some cases it's even competitors planting fake comments). This results in more complex situations where the commenter isn't necessarily interested in resolving an issue or finding an alternative, and isn't receptive to suggestions or apologies. This is particularly true when it's not just a one-off comment (more common amongst services/products that people need rather than want, and with more complex products and services).

Pingbacks and trackbacks (1)+

Comments are closed

About Brent Coker

Brent Coker

Hi. I’m Dr Brent Coker, an internet consumer psychologist, and inventor of Webreep. Here I blog mostly about my research, and how customers behave on the web! 

Google+

Page List

    Month List